Original article was published on Artificial Intelligence on Medium
Let simple tasks go to machines
Longworth: It allows organizations and people to move some of the jobs that were previously very tedious for people so they can be done by machines and repurposes the people’s skills into more complex jobs. For example, in computer vision and applying that in quality control. If you’re creating the same product again and again and paying somebody to look at that product to say whether there’s a defect on it, it’s probably not the best use of their skills. And they become fatigued.
If you look at the same thing again and again, you start to miss features of that and miss the things that have gone wrong. A computer doesn’t get that same fatigue. You can train a model to perform that quality-control step, and it won’t become tired over time. It can keep going for longer than, for example, an eight-hour shift that a typical person might work. So you’re seeing these practical applications, which then allows the workforce to concentrate on other things.
Gardner: Iveta, it wasn’t that long ago that big data was captured and analyzed mostly for the sake of compliance and business continuity. But data has become so much more strategic. How are businesses changing the way they view their data?
Lohovska: They are paying more attention to the quality of the data and the variety of the data collection that they are focused on. From a data science perspective, even if I want to say that the performance of models is extremely important, and that my data science skills are a critical component to the AI space and ecosystem, it’s ultimately about the quality of the data and the way it’s pipelined and handled.
This process of data manipulation, getting to the so-called last mile of the data science contribution, is extremely important. I believe it’s the critical step and foundation. Organizations will realize that being more selective and paying more attention to the foundations of how they handle big data―or small data―will get them to the data science part of the process.
You can already see the maturity as many customers, partners, and organizations pay more attention to the fundamental layers of AI. Then they can get better performance at the last mile of the process.
Gardner: Why are the traditional IT approaches not enough? How do cloud models help?
Cloud control and compliance
Longworth: The cloud brings opportunities for organizations insomuch as they can try before they buy. So, if you go back to the idea of processing all of that data, before an organization spends real money on purchasing GPUs, they can try them in the cloud to understand whether they work and deliver value. Then they can look at the delivery model. Does it make sense with my use case to make a capital investment, or do I go for a pay-per-use model using the cloud?
You also have the data management piece, which is understanding where your data is. From that sense, cloud doesn’t necessarily make life any less complicated. You still need to know where the data resides, control that data, and put in the necessary protections in line with the value of the data type. That becomes particularly important with legislation like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the use of personally identifiable information.
If you don’t have your data management under control and understand where all those copies of that data are, then you can’t be compliant with GDPR, which says you may need to delete all of that data.
So you need to be aware of what you’re putting in the cloud versus what you have on premises and where the data resides across your entire ecosystem.
Gardner: Another element of the past IT approaches has to do with particulars vs. standards. We talk about the difference between managing a cow and managing a herd.
How do we attain a better IT infrastructure model to attain digital business transformation and fully take advantage of AI? How do we balance between a standardized approach, but also something that’s appropriate for specific use cases? And why is the architecture of today very much involved with that sort of a balance, Andy?
Longworth: The first thing to understand is the specific use case and how quickly you need insights. We can process, for example, data in near real time, or we can use batch processing like we did in days of old. That use case defines the kind of processing.
If, for example, you think about an autonomous vehicle, you can’t batch process the sensor data coming from that car as it’s driving on the road. You need to be able to do that in near real time―and that comes at a cost. You not only need to manage the flow of data; you need the compute power to process all of that data in near real time.
So understand the criticality of the data and how quickly you need to process it. Then we can build solutions to process the data within that framework and within the right time that it needs to be processed. Otherwise, you’re putting additional cost into a use case that doesn’t necessarily need to be there.
When we build those use cases, we typically use cloud-like technologies―be that containers or scalar technologies. That allows us portability of the use case, even if we’re not necessarily going to deploy it in the cloud. It allows us to move the use case as close to the data as possible.
For example, if we’re talking about a computer vision use case on a production line, we don’t want to be sending images to the cloud and have the high latency and processing of the data. We need a very quick answer to control the production process. So you would want to move the inference engine as close to the production line as possible. And, if we use things like HPE Edgeline computing and containers, we can place those systems right there on the production line to get the answers as quickly as we need.
So being able to move the use case where it needs to reside is probably one of the biggest things that we need to consider.
Gardner: Iveta, why is the so-called explore, experiment, and evolve approach using such a holistic ecosystem of support the right way to go?
Scientific methods and solutions
Lohovska: Because AI is not easy. If it were easy, then everyone would be doing it and we would not be having this conversation. It’s not a simple statistical use case or a program or business intelligence app where you already have the answer or even an idea of the questions you are asking.
The whole process is in the data science title. You have the word science, so there is a moment of research and uncertainty. It’s about the way you explore the data, the way you understand the use cases, starting from the fact that you have to define your business case and you have to define the scope.
My advice is to start small, not exhaust your resources or the trust of the different stakeholders. Also define the correct use case and the desired return on investment. HPE is even working on the definitions and the business case when approaching an AI use case, trying to understand the level of complexity and the required level of prediction needed to achieve the use case’s success.
Such an exploration phase is extremely important so that everyone is aligned and finds a right path to minimize failure and get to the success of monetizing data and AI. Once you have the fundamentals, once you have experimented with some use cases, and you see them up and running in your production environment, then it is the moment to scale them.
I think we are doing a great job bringing all of those complicated environments together, with their data complexity, model complexity, and networking and security regulations, into one environment that’s in production and can quickly bring value to many use cases.
This flow is extremely important, of experimenting and not approaching things like you have a fixed answer or fixed approach. It’s extremely important, and this is the way we at HPE are approaching AI.
Gardner: It sounds as if we are approaching some sort of a unified reference architecture that’s inclusive of systems, cloud models, data management, and AI services. Is that what’s going to be required? Andy, do we need a grand unifying theory of AI and data management to make this happen?
Longworth: I don’t think we do. Maybe one day we will get to that point, but what we are reaching now is a clear understanding of what architectures work for which use cases and business requirements. We are then able to apply them without having to experiment every time we go into this because it’s a complement to what Iveta said.
When we start to look at these use cases, when we engage with customers, what’s key is making sure there is business value for the organization. We know AI can work, but the question is, does it work in the customer’s business context?
If we can take out a good deal of that experimentation and come in with a fairly good answer to the use case in a specific industry, then we have a good jump-start on that.
As time goes on and AI develops, we will see more generic AI solutions that can be used for many different things. But at the moment, it’s really still about point solutions.
Gardner: Let’s find out where AI is making an impact. Let’s look first, Andy, at digital prescriptive maintenance and quality control. You mentioned manufacturing a little earlier. What’s the problem, context, and how are we getting better business outcomes?
Monitor maintenance with AI
Longworth: The problem is the way we do maintenance schedules today. If you look back in history, we had reactive maintenance that was basically … something breaks and then we fix it.
Now, most organizations are in a preventative mode so a manufacturer gives a service window and says, “OK, you need to service this machinery every 1,000 hours of running.” And that happens whether it’s needed or not.
When we get into prescriptive and predictive maintenance, we only service those assets as they actually need it, which means having the data, understanding the trends, recognizing if problems are forthcoming, and then fixing them before they impact the business.
That data from machinery may sense temperature, vibration, speed, and getting a condition-based monitoring view and understanding in real time what’s happening with the machinery. You can then also use past history to be able to predict what is going to happen in the future with that machine.
We can get to a point where we know in real time what’s happening with the machinery and have the capability to predict the failures before they happen.
The prescriptive piece comes in when we understand the business criticality or the business impact of an asset. If you have a production line and you have two pieces of machinery on that production line, both may have the identical probability of failure. But one is on your critical manufacturing path, and the other is some production buffer.
The prescriptive piece goes beyond the prediction to understand the business context of that machinery and applying that to how you are behaving and then how you react when something happens with that machine.
As a business, the way that you are going to deal with those two pieces of machinery is different. You will treat the one on the critical path differently than the one where you have a product buffer. And so the prescriptive piece goes beyond the prediction to understanding the business context of that machinery and applying that to how you are behaving, and then how you react when something happens with that machine.
That’s the idea of the solution when we build digital prescriptive maintenance. The side benefit that we see is the quality control piece. If you have a large piece of machinery that you can test to it running perfectly during a production run, for example, then you can say with some certainty what the quality of the outcoming product from that machine will be.
Gardner: So we have AI overlooking manufacturing and processing. It’s probably something that would make you sleep a little bit better at night, knowing that you have such a powerful tool constantly observing and reporting.
Let’s move on to our next use case. Iveta, video analytics and surveillance. What’s the problem we need to solve? Why is AI important to solving it?
Scrutinize surveillance with AI
Lohovska: For video surveillance and video analytics in general, the overarching field is computer vision. This is the most mature and currently the trendiest AI field, simply because the amount of data is there, the diversity is there, and the algorithms are getting better and better. It’s no longer state of the art, where it’s difficult to grasp, adopt, and bring into production. So now the main goal is moving into production and monetizing these types of data sources.
When you talk about video analytics or surveillance, or any kind of quality assurance, the main problem is improving on or detecting human errors, behaviors, and environments. Telemetry plays a huge role here, and there are many complements and constraints to consider in this environment.
That makes it hardware-dependent and also requires AI at the edge, where most of the algorithms and decisions need to happen. If you want to detect fire, detect fraud or prevent certain types of failure, such as quality failure or human failure―time is extremely important.
At HPE Pointnext Services, we have been working on our own solution and reference architectures to approach those problems because of the complexity of the environment, the different cameras, and hardware handling the data acquisition process. Even at the beginning it’s enormous and very diverse. There is no one-size-fits-all. There is no one provider or one solution that can handle surveillance use cases or broad analytical use cases at the manufacturing plant or oil and gas rig where you are trying to detect fire or oil and gas spills from the different environments. So being able to approach it holistically, to choose the right solution for the right complement, and design the architecture is key.
Also, it’s essential to have the right hardware and edge devices to acquire the data and handle the telemetry. Let’s say when you are positioning cameras in an outside environment and you have different temperatures, vibrations, and heat. This will reflect on the quality of the acquired information going through the pipeline.
Some of the benefits in use cases using computer vision and video surveillance include real-time information coming from manufacturing plants, knowing that all the safety and security standards there are met and that the people operating are following the instructions and have the safeguards required for a specific manufacturing plant is also extremely important.
When you have a quality assurance use case, video analytics is one source of information to tackle the problem. For example, improving the quality of your products or batches is just one source in the computer vision field. Having the right architecture, being agile and flexible, and finding the right solution for the problem and the right models deployed at the right edge device―or at the right camera―is something we are doing right now. We have several partners working to solve the challenges of video analytics use cases.
Gardner: When you have a high-scaling, high-speed AI to analyze video, it’s no longer a gating factor that you need to have humans reviewing the processes. It allows video to be used in so many more applications, even augmented reality, so that you are using video on both ends of the equation, as it were. Are we seeing an explosion of applications and use cases for video analytics and AI, Iveta?
Lohovska: Yes, absolutely. The impact of algorithms in this space is enormous. Also, all the open source datasets, such as ImageNet and ResNet, allow a huge amount of data to train any kind of algorithms on those open source datasets. You can adjust them and pre-train them for your own use cases, whether it’s healthcare, manufacturing, or video surveillance. It’s very enabling.
You can see the diversity of the solutions people are developing and the different programs they are tackling using computer vision capabilities, not only from the algorithms, but also from the hardware side, because the cameras are getting more and more powerful.
Currently, we are working on several projects in the non-visible human spectrum. This is enabled by the further development of the hardware acquiring those images that we can’t see.
Gardner: If we can view and analyze machines and processes, perhaps we can also listen and talk to them. Tell us about speech and natural language processing (NLP), Iveta. How is AI enabling those businesses and how they transform themselves?
Speech-to-text to protect
Lohovska: This is another strong field for how AI is used and still improving. It’s not as mature as computer vision, simply because of the complexity of human language and speech and the way speech gets recorded and transferred. It’s a bit more complex, so it’s not only a problem of technologies and people writing algorithms, but also linguists being able to combine the grammar problems and write the right equation to solve those grammar problems.
But one very interesting field in the speech and NLP area is speech-to-text, so basically being able to transcribe speech into text. It’s very helpful for emergency organizations handling emergency calls or fraud detection, where you need, in real time, to detect fraud or danger. If someone is in danger, it’s a very common use case for law enforcement or for security organizations or for simply improving the quality of your service for call centers.
This example is industry- or vertical-independent. You can have finance, manufacturing, retail―but all of them have some kind of customer support. This is the most common use case, being able to record and improve the quality of your services, based on the analysis you can apply. Similar to the video analytics use case, the problem here, too, is handling the complexity of different algorithms, different languages, and the varying quality of the recordings.
A reference architecture, where you have the different components designed on exactly this holistic approach, allows the user to explore, evolve, and experiment in this space. We choose the right complement for the right problem and how to approach it.
And in this case, if we combine the right data science tool with the right processing tool and the right algorithms on top of it, then you can simply design the solution and solve the specific problem.
Gardner: Our next and last use case for AI is one people are probably very familiar with, and that’s the autonomous driving technology (ADT).
Andy, how are we developing highly automated-driving infrastructures that leverage AI and help us get to that potential nirvana of truly self-driving and autonomous vehicles?
Data processing drives vehicles
Longworth: There are several problems around highly autonomous driving as we have seen. It’s taking years to get to the point where we have fully autonomous cars, and there are clear advantages to it.
If you look at, for example, what the World Health Organization (WHO) says, there are more than 1 million deaths per year in road traffic accidents. One of the primary drivers for ADT is that we can reduce the human error in cars on the road―and reduce the number of fatalities and accidents. But to get to that point, we need to train these immensely complex AI algorithms that take massive amounts of data from the car.
Just purely from the sensor point of view, we have high-definition cameras giving 360-degree views around the car. You have radar, GPS, audio, and vision systems. Some manufacturers use light detection and ranging (LIDAR), some not. But you have all of these sensors giving massive amounts of data. And to develop those autonomous cars, you need to be able to process all of that raw data.
Typically, in an eight-hour shift, an ADT car generates somewhere between 70 and 100 terabytes of data. If you have an entire fleet of cars, then you need to be able to very quickly get that data off of the car so that you can get them back out on the road as quickly as possible. Then you need to get that data from where you offload it into the data center so that the developers, data scientists, analysts, and engineers can build to the next iteration of the autonomous driving strategy.
When you have built that, tested it, and done all the good things that you need to do, you need to next be able to get those models and that strategy from the developers back into the cars again. It’s like the other AI problems that we have been talking about but on steroids, because of the sheer volume of data and because of the impact of what happens if something should go wrong.
At HPE Pointnext Services, we have developed a set of solutions that address several of the pain points in the ADT development process. First is the ingest: How can we use HPE Edgeline processing in the car to pre-process data and reduce the amount of data that you have to send back to the data center? Also, you have to send back the most important data after the eight-hour drive first, and then send the run-of-the-mill, backup data later.
The second piece is the data platform itself, building a massive data platform that is extensible to store all the data coming from the autonomous driving test fleet. That needs to also expand as the fleet grows as well as to support different use cases.
The data platform and the development platform are not only massive in terms of the amount of data that it needs to hold and process but also in terms of the required tooling. We have been developing reference architectures to enable automotive manufacturers, along with the suppliers of those automotive systems, to build their data platforms and provide all the processing that they need so their data scientists can continuously develop autonomous driving strategies and be able to test them in a highly automated way, while also giving access to the data to the additional suppliers.
For example, the sensor suppliers need to see what’s happening to their sensors while they are on the car. The platform that we have been putting together is really concerned with having the flexibility for those different use cases, the scalability to be able to support the data volumes of today, but also to grow―to be able to have the data volumes of the not-too-distant future.
The platform also supports the speed and data locality, so being able to provide high-speed parallel file systems, for example, to feed those ML development systems and help them train the models that they have.
So all of this pulls together the different components we have talked about with the different use cases, but at a scale that is much larger than several of the other use cases, probably put together.
Gardner: It strikes me that the ADT problem, if solved, enables so many other major opportunities. We are talking about micro-data centers that provide high-performance compute (HPC) at the edge. We are talking about the right hybrid approach to the data management problem―what to move, what to keep local, how to then have a lifecycle approach to. So, ADT is really a key use-case scenario.
Why is HPE uniquely positioned to solve ADT that will then lead to so many enabling technologies for other applications?
Longworth: Like you said, the micro-data center―every autonomous driving car essentially becomes a data center on wheels. So being able to provide that compute at the edge to enable the processing of all that sensor data.
If you look at the HPE portfolio of products, there are very few organizations that have edge compute solutions and the required processing power in such small packages. But it’s also about being able to wrap it up in not only the hardware but the solution on top, the support, and being able to provide a flexible delivery model.
Lots of organizations want to have a cloud-like experience, not just from the way they consume the technology but also in the way they pay for the technology. So, HPE providing Everything-as-a-Service allows being able to pay for it all as you use it for your autonomous driving platform. Again, there are very few organizations in the world that can offer that end-to-end value proposition.
Collaborate and corroborate
Gardner: Iveta, why does it take a team-sport and solution approach from the data science perspective to tackle these major use cases?
They can attack the complexity of those use cases from each side because it requires not just data science and the hardware but a lot of domain-specific expertise to solve those problems, too.
Lohovska: I agree with Andy. The way we approach those complex use cases and the fact that you can have them as a service―and not only infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) or data-as-a-service (DaaS) but working on AI and modeling-as-a-service (MaaS). You can have a marketplace for models and being able to plug and play different technologies, experiment, and rapidly deploy them allows you to rapidly get value out of those technologies. That is something we are doing on a daily basis with amazing experts and people with the knowledge of the different layers. They can then attack the complexity of those use cases from each side, because it requires not just data science and the hardware but a lot of domain-specific expertise to solve those problems. This is something we are looking at and we are doing in-house.
And I am extremely happy to say that I have the pleasure to work with all of those amazing people and experts within HPE.
Gardner: And there is a great deal more information available on each of these use cases for AI. There are white papers on the HPE website in Pointnext Services.
What else can people do, Andy, to get ready for these high-level AI use cases that lead to digital business transformation? How should organizations be setting themselves up on a people, process, and technology basis to become adept at AI as a core competency?
Longworth: It is about people, technology, process, and all these things combined. You don’t go and buy AI in a box. You need a structured approach. You need to understand what the use cases are that give value to your organization and to be able to quickly prototype those, quickly experiment with them, and prove the value to your stakeholders.
Where a lot of organizations get stuck is moving from that prototyping, proof of concept (POC), and proof of value (POV) phase into full production. It is tough getting the processes and pipelines that enable you to transition from that small POV phase into a full production environment. If you can crack that nut, then the next use cases that you implement, and the next business problems that you want to solve with AI, become infinitely easier. It is a hard step to go from POV through to the full production because there are so many bits involved.
You have that whole value chain from grabbing hold of the data at the point of creation, processing that data, making sure you have the right people and process around that. And when you come out with an AI solution that gives some form of inference, it gives you some form of answer, you need to be able to act upon that answer.
You can have the best AI solution in the world that will give you the best predictions, but if you don’t build those predictions into your business processes, you may well have never made them in the first place.
Gardner: I’m afraid we will have to leave it there. We have been exploring how major trends in AI and advanced analytics have coalesced into top competitive differentiators for many businesses. And we have learned how AI is indispensable for digital transformation by looking at several prominent use cases and their escalating benefits.
So please join me in thanking our guests, Andy Longworth, senior solution architect in the AI and data practice at HPE Pointnext Services. Thank you so much, Andy.
Longworth: Thank you, Dana.
Gardner: And Iveta Lohovska, data scientist in the Pointnext global practice for AI and data at HPE. Thank you so much, Iveta.
Lohovska: Thank you.
Gardner: And a big thank you as well to our audience for joining us for this sponsored BriefingsDirect Voice of AI Innovation discussion. I’m Dana Gardner, principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, your host for this ongoing series of Hewlett Packard Enterprise-supported discussions.
Thanks again for listening. Please pass this along to your IT community, and do come back next time.
AI strategies and use cases: Lessons for leaders
- Advanced algorithms and new HPC and cloud options are making AI more accessible for businesses.
- Use cases include everything from prescriptive maintenance and computer vision to speech-to-text and autonomous driving.
- Many organizations get stuck moving from prototype to production. It’s important to have the right people, processes, and technologies for each use case.
This article/content was written by the individual writer identified and does not necessarily reflect the view of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.